In a review article written for the DSM-5 Gender Identity Disorders Subworkgroup, Meyer-Bahlburg (2010) concluded that "the available empirical evidence does not permit a categorical, universally valid statement that GIVs [gender identity variants] are or are not mental disorders" (p. 472). To make a categorical, universally valid statement about any class of abstract mental phenomena is an ambitious goal. I propose to address a more limited question: Do some men who desire hormonal and surgical sex reassignment have a mental disorder? I will discuss the following points:
It is understandable that Meyer-Bahlburg (2010) chose to focus on variant gender identity -- specifically, on whether such an identity could sometimes be considered disordered -- as the central issue in deciding whether persons dissatisfied with their assigned sex, gender role, or sexed body characteristics might have a mental disorder: All recent editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM; American Psychiatric Association, 1980, 1987, 1994, 2000), as well as the current edition of the International Classification of Diseases (World Health Organization, 1992), have conceptualized these clinical concerns as disorders of gender identity. Moreover, among adolescents and adults, a self-reported cross-gender identity is highly correlated with symptoms such as anatomic dysphoria, gender role dysphoria, and the desire for hormonal and surgical sex reassignment (Deogracias et al., 2007). Gender identity is, however, a slippery, imprecisely defined concept with a variety of possible meanings (Money, 1986; Ovesey & Person, 1973; Stoller, 1968). Significantly, Meyer-Bahlburg never attempted to define gender identity. He also concluded that no adequate theory of normal gender identity development had yet been proposed. Consequently, his painstaking exploration of variant gender identities, their diverse manifestations, and the possibility that such identities could sometimes be disordered, was inconclusive.
I will focus on a more specific question: Do some men who desire hormonal and surgical sex reassignment have a mental disorder? By framing the issue this way, one can avoid having to formulate a comprehensive definition of gender identity or address competing theories of normal gender identity development. Focusing on the desire for sex reassignment also ensures clinical relevance: People who are unhappy with their assigned sex or sexed body characteristics often consult mental health professionals to request sex reassignment (Meyer et al., 2001), whether or not they would describe themselves as having a disorder of gender identity.
Most men who currently request or undergo sex reassignment in the United States, Canada, and much of northern Europe are nonhomosexual (gynephilic) in sexual orientation (Lawrence, 2010). In these nonhomosexual MtF transsexuals, the desire for sex reassignment can be understood as an outgrowth of autogynephilia: sexual arousal to the thought or image of having a woman's body or otherwise resembling a woman (Blanchard, 1989a, 1989b, 1991, 1992, 1993a, 1993b; Lawrence, 2004, 2007). The evidence supporting this conceptualization is extensive: Most nonhomosexual MtF transsexuals report a history of autogynephilic arousal, whereas most homosexual MtF transsexuals do not (Blanchard, 1985; Lawrence, 2005). Nonhomosexual cross-dressing men -- transsexual and otherwise -- who deny autogynephilic arousal display such arousal when tested phallometrically (Blanchard, Racansky, & Steiner, 1986), suggesting that such arousal is almost universal in nonhomosexual transgender men. Autogynephilic fantasies that involve having a female body, and female genitals in particular, are more closely linked to the desire for surgical sex reassignment than other autogynephilic fantasies (e.g., that involve wearing women's clothing; Blanchard, 1993a, 1993b). Desire for sex reassignment sometimes remits when a nonhomosexual man becomes attracted to a new female partner, putatively directing his attention away from autogynephilic fantasies and enactments (Blanchard, 1992; Marks, Green, & Mataix-Cols, 2000; Shore, 1984). Analogues of autogynephilia are found in men who desire limb amputations and other profound physical transformations (Lawrence, 2006, 2009), some of whom also desire sex reassignment. Most significantly, some men who desire sex reassignment candidly acknowledge that their desire is an outgrowth of autogynephilia (Lawrence, 1999a, 1999b). Accordingly, even skeptics who doubt that autogynephilia accounts for all or almost all cases of desire for sex reassignment in nonhomosexual men would have to concede that it accounts for many such cases.
Does the desire for sex reassignment in autogynephilic MtF transsexuals represent a mental disorder? I contend that it does. To meaningfully address the question, one must attempt to define the term mental disorder, an obligation that writers who discuss this topic -- including Meyer-Bahlburg (2010) -- too often neglect. For purposes of discussion, I will use the definition proposed by Wakefield and First (2003), in an article cited by Meyer-Bahlburg; similar definitions have recently been proposed by Stein et al. (2010) and First and Wakefield (2010). According to Wakefield and First, a mental disorder is "a 'harmful mental dysfunction,' with harm being determined by social values and the word dysfunction referring to the failure of a mental mechanism to perform its natural (i.e., evolutionarily selected) function" (p. 28). Wakefield and First recognized that an evolutionary analysis created potential epistemological challenges but argued that often "one can judge with some plausibility the functions and dysfunctions of a [mental] mechanism (or at least that a function or dysfunction likely exists), with no need for detailed direct knowledge of the evolution of the mechanism." (p. 39). They added that, in many cases, "one can make such inferences without knowing anything about the actual mechanisms. . . . Indeed, many of the DSM's categories (e.g., sleep disorders, sexual and gender identity disorders) clearly correspond to types of inferred designed mechanisms that have gone wrong." (p. 36). Wakefield and First considered a dysfunction to be harmful if it carried significant "negative implications for the individual's overall well-being" (p. 34), or perhaps sometimes for the well-being of others (p. 41). They also emphasized that the dysfunction must be "in the individual" (p. 34) and "cannot be due only to social deviance, disapproval by others, or conflict with society or others" (p. 34). Although Wakefield and First's definition may not be perfect, it provides a starting point for discussion, and the analysis that follows is not highly dependent on its specific details.
In autogynephilic MtF transsexuals, it is reasonable to infer that the mental mechanism responsible for accurately "locating erotic targets in the environment" (Freund & Blanchard, 1993, p. 558) has failed to perform its natural function: Specifically, there has been a partial or complete failure of the evolutionarily selected mechanism that keeps heterosexual erotic interest (i.e., gynephilia) directed toward erotic targets external to the self. Autogynephilic MtF transsexuals experience a powerful erotic interest in turning their own bodies into facsimiles of their preferred erotic targets (females), an interest that competes with and sometimes completely overshadows erotic interest directed toward external female partners (Blanchard, 1992). It is easy to understand why evolutionary selection might favor the development of a mental mechanism that would keep gynephilic men's erotic interest focused on external female partners. When a gynephilic man's erotic interest is instead directed primarily toward his own feminized body, one can reasonably infer that this putative mental mechanism has wholly or partly failed. If the foregoing analysis is correct, then the desire for sex reassignment in autogynephilic MtF transsexuals -- that is, in many or most nonhomosexual MtF transsexuals -- represents a genuine mental dysfunction.
Is this mental dysfunction harmful? Does it cause significant distress or otherwise significantly decrease the overall well-being of affected persons? Clinicians have observed for decades that it does. Benjamin (1966) famously observed that "there is hardly a person so constantly unhappy (before sex change) as the transsexual" (p. 66). Autogynephilic MtF transsexuals, like other types of transsexuals, experience distressing feelings of being "wrongly embodied." Prosser (1998) analyzed over 50 transsexual autobiographies, including several by nonhomosexual MtF transsexuals, and concluded that "the image of wrong embodiment describes most effectively the feeling of pre-transition (dis)embodiment: the feeling of a sexed body dysphoria profoundly and subjectively experienced" (p. 69). Perhaps the strongest evidence of the distress associated with this feeling of wrong embodiment is the extraordinary efforts transsexuals make to change their bodies, including undergoing expensive and often painful cosmetic and surgical procedures and even self-surgery in some instances.
For autogynephilic MtF transsexuals, the distress of wrong embodiment reflects an inability to actualize the intense erotic desire to have a female body. This can be understood as analogous to the distress a normophilic man would feel if he were never able to express or actualize his sexual desires. The sexed body dysphoria of autogynephilic MtF transsexuals is clearly "in the individual"; although it may coexist with distress caused by prejudice, discrimination, or unwanted gender role expectations, it is not reducible to any of these and is not merely a result of social deviance, disapproval by others, or conflict with society. If this analysis is correct, then many or most nonhomosexual men who seek or undergo sex reassignment have a genuine mental disorder. These individuals often benefit from psychiatric, hormonal, and surgical treatment of their disorder (Meyer et al., 2001); the DSM-5 should include a diagnosis applicable to them.
I have thus far avoided any detailed discussion of variant or disordered gender identity per se, but it is difficult to ignore the issue completely, because the DSM has historically conceptualized the desire for sex reassignment as representing a disorder of gender identity. This paradigm is likely to be retained in the DSM-5, even if the term gender identity is replaced by some euphemistic alternative, such as "experienced/expressed gender" (American Psychiatric Association, 2010). But the accompanying text could and should discuss the limitations of this paradigm. In particular, it should emphasize that disordered gender identity in nonhomosexual men who seek sex reassignment is best understood as an epiphenomenon, not the underlying mental disorder itself. In these men, the underlying mental disorder -- the harmful dysfunction -- is a failure of the mental mechanism that keeps heterosexual erotic desire directed toward erotic targets external to the self. This dysfunction eventually leads to a cross-gender identity, but the latter is a secondary, derivative phenomenon.
Before elaborating, I should make clear what I mean by cross-gender identity in nonhomosexual MtF transsexuals. Historically, the term gender identity has been used in two distinctly different ways. It is sometimes used to denote the fundamental sense of being male, female, or of indeterminate sex that children develop at ages 18–30 months and that is usually immutable thereafter; Stoller (1968) called this core gender identity. Nonhomosexual MtF transsexuals do not have a female or cross-gender core gender identity: In childhood, during pre-transition adulthood, and after sex reassignment, they know that they are, always have been, and always will be biologically male. But gender identity can also denote one's current sense of oneself as being psychologically male, female, or of indeterminate sex (Money, 1986). Ovesey and Person (1973) distinguished between core gender identity and the later-developing type of cross-gender identity found in transsexuals and transvestites, which reflects "an individual's self-evaluation of psychological maleness or femaleness" (p. 54). Nonhomosexual MtF transsexuals gradually develop cross-gender identities of this second type, which they experience as incongruent with their core gender identities (Stoller, 1968).
In nonhomosexual MtF transsexuals, cross-gender identity can be considered an epiphenomenon, because it develops years or decades after the mental dysfunction that putatively gives rise to it has become apparent. In persons who will eventually become nonhomosexual MtF transsexuals, a dysfunction in the mental mechanism responsible for accurately locating erotic targets in the environment -- as evidenced by the onset of erotic cross-dressing -- typically becomes apparent "just before, during, or after puberty" (Whitam, 1997, p. 192; see also Blanchard, Clemmensen, & Steiner, 1987; Doorn, Poortinga, & Verschoor, 1994). The development of a cross-gender identity in these men, however, typically occurs decades after the onset of erotic cross-dressing and is usually preceded by experiences of complete cross-dressing, public self-presentation while cross-dressed, and adopting a feminine name (Docter, 1988). Docter proposed that choosing a feminine name constituted "the most explicit statement that a cross-gender identity has emerged" (p. 209). Based on his research with nonhomosexual MtF transsexuals and other nonhomosexual cross-dressing men, many of whom also develop cross-gender identities of some strength (Docter & Prince, 1997), Docter observed that:
Among our subjects, 79% did not appear in public cross dressed prior to age 20; at that time, most of the subjects had already had several years of experience with cross dressing. The average number of years of practice with cross dressing prior to owning a full feminine outfit was 15. The average number of years of practice with cross dressing prior to adoption of a feminine name was 21. Again, we have factual evidence indicative of the considerable time required for the development of the cross-gender identity. (p. 209)
In short, autogynephilic eroticism, as evidenced by erotic cross-dressing, precedes
cross-gender identity by years or decades in nonhomosexual MtF transsexuals. These
transsexuals do not have female core gender identities, nor do they have well developed
cross-gender identities that precede and act as the driving force behind their desires
to turn their bodies into facsimiles of women's bodies. Rather, nonhomosexual MtF
transsexuals gradually develop cross-gender identities after years or decades of erotic
cross-dressing, accompanied by the autogynephilic wish to turn their bodies into facsimiles
of women's bodies. In this sense, cross-gender identity in nonhomosexual MtF transsexuals
is a secondary phenomenon or epiphenomenon. Emphasizing this point in the text discussion
of gender identity disorders in the DSM-5 would help to correct many misconceptions among
mental health professionals.
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., revised). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (2010c). Proposed revision: 302.85, Gender Identity Disorder in Adolescents or Adults. Retrieved from http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/ Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=482
Benjamin, H. (1966). The transsexual phenomenon. New York: Julian Press.
Blanchard, R. (1985). Typology of male-to-female transsexualism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 247-261.
Blanchard, R. (1989a). The classification and labeling of nonhomosexual gender dysphorias. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18, 315-334.
Blanchard, R. (1989b). The concept of autogynephilia and the typology of male gender dysphoria. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 616-623.
Blanchard, R. (1991). Clinical observations and systematic studies of autogynephilia. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 17, 235-251.
Blanchard, R. (1992). Nonmonotonic relation of autogynephilia and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 271-276.
Blanchard, R. (1993a). Partial versus complete autogynephilia and gender dysphoria. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 19, 301-307.
Blanchard, R. (1993b). Varieties of autogynephilia and their relationship to gender dysphoria. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 241-251.
Blanchard, R., Clemmensen, L. H., & Steiner, B. W. (1987). Heterosexual and homosexual gender dysphoria. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 139-152.
Blanchard, R., Racansky, I. G., & Steiner, B. W. (1986). Phallometric detection of fetishistic arousal in heterosexual male cross-dressers. Journal of Sex Research, 22, 452-462.
Deogracias, J. J., Johnson, L. L., Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F., Kessler, S. J., Schober, J. M., & Zucker, K. J. (2007). The gender identity/gender dysphoria questionnaire for adolescents and adults. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 370-379.
Docter, R. F. (1988). Transvestites and transsexuals: Toward a theory of cross-gender behavior. New York: Plenum.
Docter, R. F., & Prince, V. (1997). Transvestism: A survey of 1032 cross-dressers. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 589-605.
Doorn, C. D., Poortinga, J., & Verschoor, A. M. (1994). Cross-gender identity in transvestites and male transsexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 185-201.
First, M. B., & Wakefield, J. C. (2010). Defining 'mental disorder' in DSM-V. A commentary on: 'What is a mental/psychiatric disorder? From DSM-IV to DSM-V' by Stein et al. (2010). Psychological Medicine, 40, 1779-1782.
Freund, K., & Blanchard, R. (1993). Erotic target location errors in male gender dysphorics, paedophiles, and fetishists. British Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 558-563.
Lawrence, A. A. (1999a). Thirty-one new narratives about autogynephilia. Retrieved from http://www.annelawrence.com/twr/31narratives.html
Lawrence, A. A. (1999b). Twenty-eight narratives about autogynephilia. Retrieved from http://www.annelawrence.com/twr/28narratives.html
Lawrence, A. A. (2004). Autogynephilia: A paraphilic model of gender identity disorder. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Psychotherapy, 8(1/2), 69-87.
Lawrence, A. A. (2005). Sexuality before and after male-to-female sex reassignment surgery. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 147-166.
Lawrence, A. A. (2006). Clinical and theoretical parallels between desire for limb amputation and gender identity disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 263-278.
Lawrence, A. A. (2007). Becoming what we love: Autogynephilic transsexualism conceptualized as an expression of romantic love. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50, 506-520.
Lawrence, A. A. (2009). Erotic target location errors: An underappreciated paraphilic dimension. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 194-215.
Lawrence, A. A. (2010). Societal individualism predicts prevalence of nonhomosexual orientation in male-to-female transsexualism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 573-583.
Marks, I., Green, R., & Mataix-Cols, D. (2000). Adult gender identity disorder can remit. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 41, 273-275.
Meyer, W., III, Bockting, W. O., Cohen-Kettenis, P., Coleman, E., DiCeglie, D., Devor H., . . . Wheeler, C. (2001). The standards of care for gender identity disorders, sixth version. Düsseldorf: Symposion.
Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. (2010). From mental disorder to iatrogenic hypogonadism: Dilemmas in conceptualizing gender identity variants as psychiatric conditions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 461-476.
Money, J. (1986). Lovemaps: Clinical concepts of sexual/erotic health and pathology, paraphilia, and gender transposition in childhood, adolescence, and maturity. New York: Irvington.
Ovesey, L., & Person, E. (1973). Gender identity and sexual psychopathology in men: A psychodynamic analysis of homosexuality, transsexualism, and transvestism. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 1, 53-72.
Prosser, J. (1998). Second skins: The body narratives of transsexuality. New York: Columbia University Press.
Shore, E. S. (1984). The former transsexual: A case study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13, 277-285.
Stein, D. J., Phillips, K. A., Bolton, D., Fulford, K. W. M., Sadler, J. Z., & Kendler, K. S. (2010). What is a mental/psychiatric disorder? From DSM-IV to DSM-V. Psychological Medicine, 40, 1759-1765.
Stoller, R. J. (1968). Sex and gender: On the development of masculinity and femininity. New York: Science House.
Wakefield, J. C., & First, M. B. (2003). Clarifying the distinction between disorder and nondisorder: Confronting the overdiagnosis (false positives) problem in DSM-V. In K. A. Phillips, M. B. First, & H. A. Pincus (Eds.), Advancing DSM: Dilemmas in psychiatric diagnosis (pp. 23–55). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
Whitam, F. L. (1997). Culturally universal aspects of male homosexual transvestites and transsexuals. In B. Bullough, V. L. Bullough, & J. Elias (Eds.), Gender blending (pp. 189-203). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
World Health Organization. (1992).International statistical classification of diseases
and related health problems (10th rev., Vol. 1). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
© 2011 by Anne A. Lawrence, M.D., Ph.D. All rights reserved.